Hi Renato, > On Jun 18, 2024, at 10:16 PM, Renato Westphal <renatowestp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Em qui., 13 de jul. de 2023 às 11:42, Renato Westphal > <renatowestp...@gmail.com> escreveu: > 2 - For OSPFv3, the "prefix-sid-sub-tlv" container should be within > the "sub-tlvs" list of each extended LSA type instead of being > alongside it.
I agree and have moved them the sub-tlvs list for all the OSPFv3 top-level TLVs in -31. > The same applies to the "adj-sid-sub-tlv" and > "lan-adj-sid-sub-tlv" containers, and their corresponding lists (e.g. > "adj-sid-sub-tlvs") should be removed in favor of the generic > "sub-tlvs" list. I moved these to the sub-tlvs list for the link-tlv but kept the containers consistent with the other sub-tlv groupings in the model. We can discuss. Thanks, Acee > > Hi all, > > It seems this issue is still unresolved in the latest draft version (-30). > Could someone take a look? > > Here's an excerpt of the module tree view showing the problem: > https://pastebin.com/raw/0G6RX0dR (I think "prefix-sid-sub-tlv" should be > under "sub-tlvs", and "prefix-sid-sub-tlvs" shouldn't exist) > > Regards, > -- > Renato Westphal > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
