> On Sep 2, 2024, at 23:37, Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> wrote: > > Hi, Chris: > > Please give the proof where is the WG's consensus? We all can see and > retrieve all the responses from its WGLC process publicly.
Please read what I said closely I said we have "general consensus", there is an open discussion currently on the point of configuration and whether multi-part TLVs may be used even when not needed. > Please note: The chairs' preference doesn’t represent the WG's consensus. This is a rather insulting and offensive comment. Please raise an appeal at this point if you wish to continue with this. Chris. > > Best Regards > > Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 > Christian Hopps > 发送时间: 2024年9月3日 11:18 > 收件人: Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> > 抄送: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'Yingzhen Qu' <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>; > 'lsr-chairs' <lsr-cha...@ietf.org>; 'lsr' <lsr@ietf.org> > 主题: [Lsr] Re: 【Please Abandon this WGLC document】答复: Re: WG Last Call for > draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv (7/1/2024 - 7/15/2024) > > > "Aijun Wang" <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> writes: > >> I would like to emphasize that this document will lead to more chaos >> for the operators network, even it solves the control of when to send >> the MP-TLV problems. >> >> Please see: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ >> Gf4D3REVNXWO9BlIVPqnZ3f-GcM/ for more unsolved problems. >> >> >> >> It’s time to ABANDON it. > > As WG Chair. > > This document will NOT be abandoned. We're literally in WGLC with WG > consensus on the general solution. > > Chris. > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
