The following errata report has been verified for RFC7684,
"OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8104

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Kris Michielsen <kmich...@cisco.com>
Date Reported: 2024-09-16
Verified by: Gunter Van de Velde (IESG)

Section: 2.1

Original Text
-------------
   Route Type
      The type of the OSPFv2 route.  If the route type is 0
      (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 External Prefix
      TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type.  This
      is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an
      external entity that is not aware of the route type associated
      with the prefix.  Supported types are:

Corrected Text
--------------
   Route Type
      The type of the OSPFv2 route.  If the route type is 0
      (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix
      TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type.  This
      is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an
      external entity that is not aware of the route type associated
      with the prefix.  Supported types are:

Notes
-----
s/External Prefix/Extended Prefix/

--------------------------------------
RFC7684 (draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement
Publication Date    : November 2015
Author(s)           : P. Psenak, H. Gredler, R. Shakir, W. Henderickx, J. 
Tantsura, A. Lindem
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to