Hi Roman,
please see inline (##PP):
On 21/07/2025 10:47, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi Peter!
Thanks for the revised -08 draft.
I need help understanding how this revising is responsive to my DISCUSS
feedback about the registry (now) in Section 12.3.
I see this block of new text:
==[ snip ]==
When a new constraint is defined, the rule associated with that
constraint MAY be inserted at any position. Backwards compatibility
is guaranteed because nodes which don't support the new constraint
will not participate in an algorithm where the FAD specifies a
constraint they don't support.
The relative ordering of existing rules MUST NOT be altered. Doing
so has the potential to create backwards compatibility issues.
Deletion of the rules MUST NOT be done. Given that the rules are
only used conditionally based on the information carried in the
winning FAD, deletion of the rule is not necessary.
Merging or repeating of the rules MUST NOT be done.
There is no upper bound on the number of rules that the registry
supports.
==[ snip ]==
A few comments:
(a) What does this have to do with IANA?
(b) Is this guidance to designated expert on evaluating new registrations?
##PP
yes.
It doesn't say so. If it is, what does it mean to "modify ordering of existing
rules"?
##PP
reordering them.
Is deleting "rules" removing their registration?
##PP
yes.
(c) RFC2119 shouldn't be used in the IANA considerations sections. See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words//
##PP
I will move the guidance to the experts to a separate section called
"Guidance for Designated Experts"
Would that address your comment?
thanks,
Peter
Regards,
Roman
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Psenak <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2025 4:09 AM
To: Mohamed Boucadair <[email protected]>; Roman Danyliw
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-08
Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mohamed, Roman,
I posted the new revision of the draft that should address your comments.
Please have a look and let me know if you have any more comments.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
