Hi Zhang, Tony, > On Mar 2, 2026, at 2:10 AM, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Zhang Li, > > Perhaps I’m not understanding the problem that you’re trying to solve. It > seems to me that what you’re suggesting is that we create a special encoding > to handle the case where someone has multiple VLANs over one link between two > routers. Is that correct? Why would anyone want to do that? I
This is a common way to include an interface in multiple areas in OSPFv2. I expect it is used in OSPFv3 as well since people don't know how to configure different Instance IDs. > dislike adding hair to the protocol over a situation that should not exist. I haven't read the draft but I don't see why it makes any difference to the IGPs and agree. Thanks, Acee > > Regards, > Tony > > >> On Mar 1, 2026, at 6:56 PM, zhangli (CE) - zhangli344=40huawei.com at >> dmarc.ietf.org <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> A new document draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship-00 has been >> submitted. This draft introduces extensions to IGP, allowing a network >> device to advertise the relationship between a physical interface and its >> sub-interfaces. These extensions enable the links based on sub-interfaces to >> participate in the alternative paths for load balancing. >> >> Links for the draft is as below. >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship/ >> >> Looking forward to your review and comments. >> >> Best regards >> Li >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> 发送时间: 2026年2月28日 17:12 >> 收件人: lichenxi (A) <[email protected]>; Dongjie (Jimmy) >> <[email protected]>; zhangli (CE) <[email protected]> >> 主题: New Version Notification for >> draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship-00.txt >> >> A new version of Internet-Draft >> draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship-00.txt has been successfully >> submitted by Li Zhang and posted to the IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship >> Revision: 00 >> Title: IGP Extensions for Sub-interface Relationship Information >> Date: 2026-02-28 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 8 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship-00.txt >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship/ >> HTML: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship-00.html >> HTMLized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zl-lsr-igp-sub-interface-relationship >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document extends ISIS and OSPF, allowing a network device to >> advertise the relationship between a physical interface and its sub- >> interfaces. This extension enables the links based on sub-interfaces >> to participate in the alternative paths for load balancing in SRv6 BE >> bandwidth polling. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
