RFC Editor, This is an obvious SPAM Errata. Please reject.
Thanks, Acee > On Apr 8, 2026, at 11:39 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7987, > "IS-IS Minimum Remaining Lifetime". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8873 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: henry <[email protected]> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > i heard somthing werid > > Corrected Text > -------------- > it was weird > > Notes > ----- > nothhing else > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7987 (draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title : IS-IS Minimum Remaining Lifetime > Publication Date : October 2016 > Author(s) : L. Ginsberg, P. Wells, B. Decraene, T. Przygienda, H. > Gredler > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IS-IS for IP Internets > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
