Hi, > The GREEN wg chairs have expressed interest in this draft as far as not > wanting to be developing at cross-purposes with the work from GREEN.
This document has now been discussed with the GREEN WG and all questions have been addressed. There is no overlap between the Power Group work and GREENs work. > A proposed way forward that came from discussions between the LSR and GREEN > chairs and ADs would be for LSR to adopt this document as experimental and > move it forward with the addition of some text. The text would state that > work is on going in the IETF to define a broad power framework and that > future solutions may be proposed to incorporate this work. The authors are not ready to agree to experimental status at this time. That is unnecessary and unprecendented at this point. We want to be on the standards track. > Additionally, GREEN is asking the authors to review the green framework draft > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bcmj-green-power-and-energy-yang/) > and attempt to align where possible, and avoid incompatabilty if possible > (e.g., consider terminology and hierarchy where different). As above, we have discussed this. Due to the very different purposes (detailed modeling vs. real-time lightweight operations), there are no obvious points where compatibility can be improved. > If the work is adopted then LSR would request constructive review and > feedback from GREEN for any changes that can be made to improve the LSR work > with the goal of moving the work forward. Review is always welcome. > The LSR chairs and ADs believe the intention of the authors is to get > solution quickly deployed to start making immediate progress on power saving. > The interest from GREEN WG is that if we do this we indicate it’s an > experimental approach and we make an effort to allow for later solutions that > would incorporate the more comprehensive framework that they are working on. > Additionally, it has been pointed out that GREEN WG should be able to benefit > from the real-world experience gained from deployments of the experiment LSR > RFC. > This email services as an opportunity to raise concerns with this plan to > move forward. If the point is to make immediate progress, then we request that we move forward immediately. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
