Hi Liyan, 

What is the implementation platform? For example, are you using FRR? 

Thanks,
Acee

> On Aug 27, 2026, at 11:45 PM, Liyan Gong <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Acee,
> 
> Thanks for your checking.
> 
> Yes, we have some early implementation experience in our network. 
> 
> This solution has been deployed on a small scale, covering the IS-IS and 
> BGP-LS extensions. OSPF/OSPFv3 are not yet included at this stage.
> 
> We hope that once the document is finalized, this mechanism can be more 
> widely adopted.
> 
> Best regard,
> Liyan
> 
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2026年8月27日 3:08
> 收件人: [email protected]
> 抄送: lsr <[email protected]>
> 主题: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-06.txt
> 
> Co-authors,
> 
> One more question, are you aware of any implementations?
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> > On Aug 22, 2026, at 3:27AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-06.txt is now
> > available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
> >
> >   Title:   Advertisement of Remote Interface Identifiers for Layer 2 Bundle 
> > Members
> >   Authors: Liyan Gong
> >            Changwang Lin
> >            Xiaolong Hu
> >            Les Ginsberg
> >            Peter Psenak
> >   Name:    draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-06.txt
> >   Pages:   14
> >   Dates:   2026-08-22
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >   In networks where Layer 2 (L2) interface bundles (such as a Link
> >   Aggregation Group (LAG) as defined in IEEE 802.1AX) are deployed, a
> >   controller may need to collect the connectivity relationships between
> >   bundle members for traffic engineering (TE) purposes.  For example,
> >   when performing topology management and bidirectional path
> >   computation for TE, it is essential to know the connectivity
> >   relationships among bundle members.
> >
> >   This document describes how OSPF and IS-IS would advertise the remote
> >   interface identifiers for Layer 2 bundle members.  The corresponding
> >   extension of BGP Link State (BGP-LS) is also specified.
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remot
> > e-id/
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote
> > -id-06.html
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-mem
> > ber-remote-id-06
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to