Les, Looks good to me and my co-authors! Please ship it!
— Pax et bonum Ron Bonica From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, November 5, 2026 at 2:52 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: lsr-chairs <[email protected]>; Gunter Van De Velde (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[email protected]>; lsr <[email protected]>; Tony Li <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.txt Authors - Please review the proposed codepoint allocations. Once we have your concurrence, we will make the formal request to IANA. Thanx. Les/Chris/Hannes Refer to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps/__;!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFFWXlar4$> IANA is requested to add the following entries to the IS-IS Top-Level TLV Codepoints registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#tlv-codepoints<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml*tlv-codepoints__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFBRAZmj0$>): Table 1<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*table-1__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFJM83JCC$>: IS-IS Top-Level TLV Codepoints<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*name-is-is-top-level-tlv-codepoi__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFHWlccBy$> Value Name IIH LSP SNP Purge MP Status Reference 29 Power Group N Y N N N This document 26 Sleeping Adjacencies N Y N N Y This document IANA is also requested to add the following entries to the IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-advertising-neighbor-information<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml*isis-tlv-codepoints-advertising-neighbor-information__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFI33x8B6$>): Table 2<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*table-2__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFO4HB6n-$>: IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*name-is-is-sub-tlvs-for-tlvs-adv__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFHXxZHdZ$> Type Description 22 23 25 141 222 223 MP Reference 46 Power Group Member Y Y N N Y Y N This document 47 Interface PSP Y Y N N Y Y N This document 48 Unidirectional Sleeping Bandwidth (LAG only) Y Y N N Y Y N This document IANA is also requested to add the following entry to the IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-19of22<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml*isis-tlv-codepoints-19of22__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFAcQ936b$>): Table 3<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*table-3__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFOzRmwvX$>: IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*name-is-is-neighbor-link-attribu__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFFXxBpKe$> Table 3<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*table-3__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFOzRmwvX$>: IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.html*name-is-is-neighbor-link-attribu__;Iw!!NpxR!iBdlOpYExQTUtNkApi8bIat6oit0knrsd5lS1M0WhyyPdHBXnftZ3WbkZk-qIO7_q40t99VBggWtUAUXB6hqrJHCFFXxBpKe$> Value Name L2BM Reference 0x8 Power-Sleep Capable (requested bit value 0x0008) N This document We also strongly recommend that a new registry be defined: TLVs Permitted Embedded in a Sleeping Adjacencies TLV. This will list the TLVs which may appear embedded in the Sleeping Adjacencies TLV – currently defined in the draft as “2, 22, 23, 222 and 223”. As this does not require any new codepoints to be allocated, it does not block the early allocation of the new codepoints which are defined by the draft – but it will be helpful to implementors to know which embedded TLVs they can expect to receive and provides a public place for this list to be updated in the event new TLVs are defined in the future which may fall into this category. >-----Original Message----- >From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2026 11:49 AM >To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; Hannes Gredler ><[email protected]>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> >Cc: lsr-chairs <[email protected]>; Gunter Van De Velde (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) ><[email protected]>; lsr <[email protected]>; Tony Li <[email protected]> >Subject: [Lsr] Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-pcpps-00.txt > >IS-IS Experts (Chris, Les, Hannes), > >We've adopted the IS-IS PCPPS draft in support the TEAS PCPPS draft. Can you >please review the allocation request? > >Thanks, >Acee > >> On Oct 29, 2026, at 12:29 PM, Tony Li >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi chairs, >> >>> The next step in this process (as per RFC 7370) is for the WG chairs to >indicate to the designated experts that they feel that early allocation should >be >done at this time. >> >> >> >> Would you please do the honors? >> >> Thanks, >> Tony >> > >_______________________________________________ >Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
