Issue #412 has been updated by Clément OUDOT.
You just need to change the release version, for example:
<pre>
%define release_version 2%{?dist}
</pre>
Can we close this issue?
----------------------------------------
Feature #412: Library dependencies in RPMs built from src.rpm
http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/412
Author: Nick Milas
Status: New
Priority: Normal
Assigned to:
Category: OpenLDAP RPM
Target version: openldap-rpm-?
I am having problems upgrading from a pre-30 openldap-ltb version which I built
using a 2.4.28 src.rpm; I am trying to upgrade to openldap-ltb-2.4.30.
The problem is that a Postfix package which was built and installed on the same
server (as an RPM) based on the pre-30 version, complains; More specifically,
when upgrading, I see:
<pre>
# rpm -Uvh *
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4-releng.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
postfix-2.9.1-1.pcre.sasl2.dovecot.rhel5.x86_64
libldap-2.4-releng.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
postfix-2.9.1-1.pcre.sasl2.dovecot.rhel5.x86_64
</pre>
I noticed that in an installation of openldap-ltb 2.4.30 (on another server)
the libraries are:
<pre>
# ls -la /usr/local/openldap/lib64/
total 4312
drwxr-xr-x 2 ldap ldap 4096 Mar 22 18:01 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 ldap ldap 4096 Mar 22 18:01 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 20 Mar 22 18:01 liblber-2.4.so.2 ->
liblber-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 171360 Mar 9 19:43 liblber-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 99046 Mar 9 19:50 liblber.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 864 Mar 9 19:43 liblber.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 20 Mar 22 18:01 liblber.so -> liblber-2.4.so.2.8.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 20 Mar 22 18:01 libldap-2.4.so.2 ->
libldap-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 1096041 Mar 9 19:43 libldap-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 533294 Mar 9 19:50 libldap.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 924 Mar 9 19:43 libldap.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 22 Mar 22 18:01 libldap_r-2.4.so.2 ->
libldap_r-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 1201498 Mar 9 19:43 libldap_r-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 589700 Mar 9 19:50 libldap_r.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 947 Mar 9 19:43 libldap_r.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 22 Mar 22 18:01 libldap_r.so ->
libldap_r-2.4.so.2.8.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 20 Mar 22 18:01 libldap.so -> libldap-2.4.so.2.8.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 21 Mar 22 18:01 libslapi-2.4.so.2 ->
libslapi-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 442804 Mar 9 19:44 libslapi-2.4.so.2.8.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 208404 Mar 9 19:50 libslapi.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 862 Mar 9 19:44 libslapi.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 21 Mar 22 18:01 libslapi.so ->
libslapi-2.4.so.2.8.3
</pre>
However, in an installation of a pre-30 built using 2.4.28 src.rpm I see:
<pre>
# ls -la /usr/local/openldap/lib64/
total 4356
drwxr-xr-x 2 ldap ldap 4096 Feb 25 18:44 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 ldap ldap 4096 Feb 25 18:39 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 44543 Mar 24 2011 check_password.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 27 Feb 25 18:44 liblber-2.4-releng.so.2 ->
liblber-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 171368 Feb 25 18:38 liblber-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 99046 Feb 25 18:39 liblber.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 885 Feb 25 18:38 liblber.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 27 Feb 25 18:44 liblber.so ->
liblber-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 27 Feb 25 18:44 libldap-2.4-releng.so.2 ->
libldap-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 1096041 Feb 25 18:38 libldap-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 533294 Feb 25 18:39 libldap.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 945 Feb 25 18:38 libldap.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 29 Feb 25 18:44 libldap_r-2.4-releng.so.2 ->
libldap_r-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 1201506 Feb 25 18:38 libldap_r-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 589700 Feb 25 18:39 libldap_r.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 968 Feb 25 18:38 libldap_r.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 29 Feb 25 18:44 libldap_r.so ->
libldap_r-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 27 Feb 25 18:44 libldap.so ->
libldap-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 28 Feb 25 18:44 libslapi-2.4-releng.so.2 ->
libslapi-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 442804 Feb 25 18:38 libslapi-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 208404 Feb 25 18:39 libslapi.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ldap ldap 883 Feb 25 18:38 libslapi.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ldap ldap 28 Feb 25 18:44 libslapi.so ->
libslapi-2.4-releng.so.2.8.2
</pre>
So, I have the following questions:
1. Why there are these differences between the libraries of the two versions?
2. Why Postfix, when being built, did not simply use liblber.so and libldap.so
but it registered the full name of the libraries?
I built using:
<pre>
CCARGS="${CCARGS} -DHAS_LDAP -I/usr/local/openldap/include"
AUXLIBS="${AUXLIBS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64 -lldap -llber"
</pre>
3. Is there a way in which I can build other software RPMs (using LTB Openldap
libraries) forcing the use of libldap.so and liblber.so so that (the exact name
of the library is not used by the RPM build mechanism and) upgrade problems may
be avoided?
After such errors, I am afraid that I might have more such upgrade problems in
the future.
Please advise.
Regards and thanks.
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it,
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here:
http://tools.lsc-project.org/my/account
_______________________________________________
ltb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ltb-project.org/listinfo/ltb-dev
