2017-06-22 11:40 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pluta <[email protected]>: > Dear Clément, >
Hello Daniel, > I'm interested into openldap-ltb debian packages, and have some short > questions regaring your announcement > (http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201706/msg00025.html) on > the openldap-technical mailinglist. As I think that my questions are > off-topic on the openldap-technical I email you directly: Yes, but not off-topic for LTB project, you use our mailing list here: https://ltb-project.org/community#mailing_lists > I would like to give the openldap-ltb package a try, but I use debian Strech > (stable since 17th June) and testing and could not find a suitable package. > > 1. Do you plan to offer a package for Strech or even testing (just with mdb > backend, no bdb)? > Not yet, but we should do it if jessie packages are not compatible with stretch, to be tested. For 2.4, we still ship BerkeleyDb as a separate package, because back-hdb is still officially supported. It will be removed for 2.5. > 2a. If not, could you please give me a hint, how to do this myself (I've > seen the ltb-github-repo, but I'm a bit confused because of berkeley-db). There is a README here: https://github.com/ltb-project/openldap-deb/blob/master/debian/paquet-openldap-debian/packaging_debian.README It should give you some hints. > 2b. How hard would it be to split the openldap-ltb package (similar to the > official debian packages) into seperate openldap-ltb-libutils|libldap|slapd > packages? It would require to work on our packaging. For the moment we choose to have the same package organization between RPM and DEB. The goal is not to replace Debian official packages, but to provide an alternative (installed in /usr/local). Hope this helps, Clément. _______________________________________________ ltb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ltb-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltb-users
