Hi Mark, I've updated CVS and uploaded the patch to CVS.
Thanks again, Stuart On 28/06/11 08:47, Stuart Hughes wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the patch, I'll try to get this in as soon as possible. > > Regards, Stuart > > On 27/06/11 16:54, Mark wrote: >> Hello >> >> The procps package was building successfully on one of my machines, but was >> failing to build on another machine, reporting errors similar to the >> following: >> >> display.c:(.text+0x290): undefined reference to `readtask' >> display.c:(.text+0x2b4): undefined reference to `readtask' >> ps/display.o: In function `want_this_proc_pcpu': >> display.c:(.text+0x3ac): undefined reference to `Hertz' >> ps/display.o: In function `signal_handler': >> display.c:(.text+0x3d0): undefined reference to `signal_number_to_name' >> display.c:(.text+0x404): undefined reference to `procps_version' >> . >> <snip> >> >> This is apparently related to the order in which files are included when >> processing the 'include */module.mk' line in the Makefile. When >> 'ps/module.mk' >> is included before 'proc/module.mk' the build fails. See >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2010-07/msg00153.html >> >> The attached patches are as follows: >> >> procps-3.2.7-makefile.patch - changes the Makefile to include the files in >> the >> desired order. >> >> procps-spec-makefile.patch - updates the spec file to apply the above patch. >> >> Regards >> >> Mark >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org >> >> Ltib mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib > > > > _______________________________________________ > LTIB home page: http://ltib.org > > Ltib mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib _______________________________________________ LTIB home page: http://ltib.org Ltib mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
