On 10/19/2012 09:55 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote: > On 19/10/12 13:48, Peter Barada wrote: >> On 10/19/2012 08:19 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote: >>> On 18/10/12 16:33, Peter Barada wrote: >>>> Stuart, >>>> >>>> bin/depmod.pl looks for either 2.4 or 2.6 series kernels to determine >>>> formating of /lib/modules/<kernel>/modules.dep. The older 2.4 series >>>> uses backslashes and blank lines formatting whereas the newer kernels >>>> series doesn't. Unfortunately depmod.pl determiens a 3.x series >>>> kernel >>>> should use the old format which breaks modprobe/modinfo. >>>> >>>> The attached patch addresses this by making a 2.4 series kernel "old" >>>> and everything else "new". >>>> >>> Thanks Peter, >>> >>> I'll get this applied. >>> >>> BTW: did you get a chance to test the "distclean" patch I send you? >> Sorry, but yes. My world's a bit tweaked from the standard LTIB since >> I've hacked up the ltib script to handle git/SVN repositories and run >> the prep step before checking if anything has changed (only for git/SVN >> packages). >> >> Oce I modified the distclean patch to fit my ltib script it worked >> for me. >> >> > Okay, if I check-in the patch I made as a baseline, can you then work > with Mike to see if it's possible to come up with something that will > work for everyone that includes git/SVN.
Sure. It will take some time to come up with something suitable for all. Adding support for SVN/GIT (or other SCM) on a per-package basis makes my life much easier in trying to support continuous integration (aka buildbot) as well as multi-person cross-platform development efforts. -- Peter Barada [email protected] _______________________________________________ LTIB home page: http://ltib.org Ltib mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
