On Friday 07 September 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:28:26AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 07 September 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > [...] > > > * The sizeof() operator and the prefix and postfix "++" and "--" > > > operators are not required. > > > [...] > > > > so then you'd like to revise your statement that these are not bashisms, > > just common POSIX extensions that a lazy shell you're using hasnt > > implemented :P > > If you want to be pedantic, then [ -a foo ] isn't a bashism either, it's > a kshism. I'm not sure I see the point in arguing the toss here -- it's > a feature that a conforming POSIX shell need not (and in at least one > case does not) implement.
i'm being pedantic in the sense of whether it's POSIX. you said the script was not POSIX compliant when in reality it is. i deal with this crap much often than i'd like so i'm a bit pickier than many. > > i'll see about tweaking the code to not use the extremely handy postfix > > operators > > Thanks. fixed in cvs now -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
