And this is Applied too. Thanks very much.

--Subrata

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 16:06 +0530, Amit K Arora wrote:
> 
> Hi Subrata, 
> 
> Here is the add-on patch which applies on top of the previous patch
> (as matter of fact, it will apply cleanly without the previous patch
> too ;) 
> 
> 
> I have removed the mention of "RHEL 3" from the concerned message. I
> didn't add any other message like "this should be okay for kernel >
> xxx", since the new code (original patch) should take care of kernels
> which are < 2.6.9  and also which are >= 2.6.9 (hence all the
> kernels). Thus I thought that this message is no longer valid and
> could be cut short to whats there in this new add-on patch.  
> 
> Yes, I have tested the patch. :) 
> 
> Thanks!
> Regards,
> Amit Arora 
> 
> 
> Subrata Modak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> 
> 01/02/08 03:51 PM 
>          Please respond to
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                To
> Amit K
> Arora/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>                cc
> Anoop V
> Chakkalakkal/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], ltp-list 
> <[email protected]>, Santwana Samantray/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>           Subject
> Re: [LTP] [PATCH]
> mlockall02
> configuration
> error and fix
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 15:45 +0530, Amit K Arora wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Subrata, 
> > 
> > I agree that the message should be changed. But, I think we can do
> it
> > as a separate patch. 
> > Will send a separate patch which will apply on top of the current
> one.
> 
> That would be really great indeed.
> 
> --Subrata
> 
> >  Thanks! 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Amit Arora 
> > 
> > 
> > Subrata Modak
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > 
> > 01/02/08 02:57 PM 
> >          Please respond to
> >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >                To
> > Amit K
> > Arora/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >                cc
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], ltp-list <[email protected]>,
> Santwana Samantray/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED], Anoop V
> Chakkalakkal/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >           Subject
> > Re: [LTP] [PATCH]
> > mlockall02
> > configuration
> > error and fix
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 09:47 +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> > > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Please find below a configuration error reported by Santwana,
> and,
> > then
> > > > the fix for the same by Amit:
> > > > 
> > > >
> >
> ========================================================================================
> > > > ---Problem Description---
> > > > Configuration error in mlockall02.
> > > > mlockall02 did not BEHAVE as expected.
> > > >  
> > > > ---uname output---
> > > > Linux 2.6.18-53.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 16:48:44 EDT 2007
> x86_64
> > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > > >  
> > > > Machine Type = e326m
> > > >  
> > > > ---Debugger---
> > > > A debugger is not configured
> > > >  
> > > > ---Steps to Reproduce---
> > > > 1.Copy and untar ltp testsuite.
> > > > 2.Issue make followed by make install.
> > > > 3.Go to testcases/kernel/syscalls/mlockall directory inside the
> > ltp test suite.
> > > > 4.Run mlockall02 by issuing ./mlockall02.
> > > > 5.It produces configuration error as :
> > > > "mlockall02    1  CONF  :  mlockall02 did not BEHAVE  as
> > expected.This may be
> > > > okay if you are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (RHEL)".
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > just as a general rule, I don't think it is correct to exit with a
> > message
> > > referring to a specific Linux distro. If the issue is in some way
> > kernel related,
> > > it should be better something like that
> > > " ... This may be  (or 'is') ok if you run with a kernel version >
> > x.y.z"
> > > 
> > 
> > Amit,
> > 
> > Can this message be removed through a patch and appropriate message
> > written instead ?
> > 
> > --Subrata
> > 
> > > In the embedded world, as mine, this info is certainly more
> useful.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Carmelo
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to