On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:21 +0530, naresh kumar wrote: > hello Jose > > at ltp-full-20080229/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mprotect > > May I know the reason why you are not implemented mprotect to generate > EFAULT? > > > > And in the mprotect01.c mentioned that > > > > HISTORY > > 07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer > > 03/2002 Paul Larson: case 1 should expect ENOMEM not EFAULT > > > > What it mean. > > In the kernel source tree do we have implementation for > EFAULT from mprotect?
If the implementation is there, create a new test scenario and submit a patch. Regards-- Subrata > > > > > > Thanks & regards > > > > NARESH KAMBOJU > > Senior Software Developer > > Embedded Production Group > > Sony India Software Center. > > 1st floor, East Wing, > > Maruthi Info Tech Center Ring Road > > Bangalore-560 071 > > Karnataka. > > India. > > > > Tel: 91-80-6624 7000 > > Fax: 91-80-6624 7250 > > Mobile No: 91-9886108065 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
