Jeff Burke wrote:
> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:16:11PM -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>>> pls, provide more info: full log, ltp version and etc
>>>> naveen penumala wrote:
>>>>> hiee,
>>>>>
>>>>> Below test cases were failed in my SUSE 10.1 system. could you please let 
>>>>> me know what might be the reason for these failures.
>>>>> Is it required to install any rpms or any thing. please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> msgctl01                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl02                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl03                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl04                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl05                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl06                       FAIL       1
>>>>> msgctl07                       FAIL       1
>>>>> msgctl08                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgctl09                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgget01                       FAIL       1
>>>>> msgget02                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgget04                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv01                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv02                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv03                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv04                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv05                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgrcv06                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd01                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd02                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd03                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd04                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd05                       FAIL       2
>>>>> msgsnd06                       FAIL       2
>>>>>
>> pls, send me output from next command: 
>> # ipcs -a
>> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/msgmni
>>
>> may be the system limit for the maximum number of message queues
>> (MSGMNI) exceeded already.
> Looks like your thought about max number of message queues was correct.
> 
> Here is the data you requested.
> 
> Both before the test was started and after the test had run.
> 
> I am running a test now to see which   of the other ltp tests
> that run before this one cause it to fail.
Andrew
If you run the ipc (ltp-full-20080630/runtest/ipc) tests prior to 
running the syscalls (ltp-full-20080630/runtest/syscalls) tests it will 
cause the syscalls msgXXXXX to fail.

Here is the only caveat to the issue. As I have noted in previous 
mailing list emails I still have two IPC testcases that fail with the 
ltp-full-20080630 release.
- message_queue_test_02_ctl
- message_queue_test_05
So is the current behavior because one of those two tests are failing?
(Not cleaning up properly) Or would syscalls test to fail anyways if 
those IPC test were passing.

Subrata,
Any feedback yet about those failing tests? Topic:
Re: [LTP] message_queue_test_02_ctl FAILING while running through "runltp"

Thanks,
Jeff
>>> Andrew,
>>>     Attached is a full log.
>>> - RHEL5.2 GA (i386), Kernel 2.6.18-92.el5
>>> - LTP version is 20080630
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to