On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 02:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > Hi Sharayathi, > > On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 18:08 +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote: > > Subrata > > I have fixed the problem noticed earlier. Hope it will be fine this > > time. More over I wanted to mention that I have dropped getcpu2.c as it > > was found to be less relevant for getcpu() testing. > > I have tested this on the following machines/architectures: > > 1) 2.6.18-92.el5,x86_64, > 2) 2.6.9-22.EL,ppc64, > 3) 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5,x86_64, > 4) 2.6.16.21-0.8-ppc64,ppc64, > 5) 2.6.23.13,ia64, and, > 6) 2.6.18-91.el5PAE,i386, > > All build/install/run issue(s) are taken care off properly. The same > patch has been merged. Thanks for writing the test cases for getcpu() > and contributing the same to LTP. > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > Andi had made some suggestions to improve the test, I am submitting > > this before making all those changes. If possible I will sit and work on > > Andi's suggestion.
Sure, please keep improving the test case whenever you find time to do that. Regards-- Subrata > > Thanks > > Yeehaw > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
