I observed something in tlibio.h.

LIO_IO_TYPES and LIO_WAIT_TYPES are not defined for uClinux.

They are defined for other linux varieties like regular linux, cray, hp etc.
but not uClinux.

and that is why io_type gets a wrong value in fs/doio/growfile.c(though
LIO_RANDOM bit inside is correct) 
which eventually fails at line 996 in tlibio.c(shown below) as no random
method could be obtained as LIO_IO_TYPES and LIO_WAIT_TYPES are undefined
for uClinux

case 'I':
#if NEWIO
                        if((io_type=lio_parse_io_arg1(optarg)) == -1 ) {


else {
  996   printf("DEBUG %s/%d: No I/O method chosen\n", __FILE__, __LINE__ );



Cai Qian-6 wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch fixes gf07 and other gf* test failures reported earlier,
> 
> gf01                           FAIL       1
> gf02                           FAIL       1
> gf03                           PASS       0
> gf04                           PASS       0
> gf05                           FAIL       1
> gf06                           PASS       0
> gf07                           FAIL       1
> gf08                           PASS       0
> gf09                           FAIL       1
> gf10                           FAIL       1
> gf11                           FAIL       1
> gf12                           PASS       0
> gf13                           FAIL       1
> gf14                           PASS       0
> gf15                           FAIL       1
> gf16                           PASS       0
> gf17                           PASS       0
> gf18                           FAIL       1
> gf19                           FAIL       1
> 
> The first problem is that the lastest patch against lib/Makefile always
> exported some unnecessary symbols,
> 
>   CFLAGS+= -D_USC_LIB_ -D__UCLIBC__
> 
> which broke the tlibio.c functionalities. For example,
> 
> ...
>   #if defined(sgi) || (defined(__linux__) && !defined(__UCLIBC__))
>       else if ( method & LIO_IO_SYNCP ) {
>         io_type="pread(2)";
> ...
> 
> All of those code above will never get executed for Linux PCs, even if
> it has nothing to do with UCLIBC. As the results, tests failed due to
> falling back to no suitable IO methods found,
> 
>   else {
>       printf("DEBUG %s/%d: No I/O method chosen\n", __FILE__, __LINE__ );
>       return -1;
> 
> The second problem is that gf07 test case failed with the following
> (with debug flags enabled for both tlibio.c and growfiles.c),
> 
> # growfiles -W gf07 -b -e 1 -r 1-5000 -R 0--2 -i 0 -L 30 -C 1 -I p
>   g_rand13 g_rand13.2 -D 9
> 
> ...
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG3 growfiles.c/2038: lseeked to random offset 2052
> (fsz:0)
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG3 growfiles.c/2080: attempting to write 4250 bytes
> ...
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG5 growfiles.c/2173: about to chop Woffset.
> tmp=2052, grow_incr=4250, Woffset was 2052
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG2 growfiles.c/2197: 1 wrote 4250 bytes(off:0),
> grew file by 4250 bytes
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG3 growfiles.c/2418: about to do write validation,
> offset = 0, size = 4250
> growfiles: 12182 DEBUG4 growfiles.c/2428: lseeked to offset:0
> DEBUG tlibio.c/1337: aio_read(fildes=3, buf, nbytes=4250, signo=10)
> ...
> growfiles(gf07): 12182 growfiles.c/2513: 1 CW data mismatch at offset 0,
> exp:0101, act:0 in file g_rand13
> ...
> 
> This is due to when doing write validation, it started from an incorrect
> offset -- 0! The file was originally written from a random offset
> 2052. However, it looks like a known issue for async IO highlighted in
> growfiles.c, which has already been manually worked around for SGI
> platform.
> 
> #if NEWIO
> #ifdef sgi
>  /* If this is POSIX I/O and it is via aio_{read,write}
>   * or lio_listio then after completion of the I/O the
>   * value of the file offset for the file is
>   * unspecified--which means we cannot trust what
>   * tell() told us.  Fudge it here.
>   */
> 
> So, we probably need to do the same for __linux__.
> 
> Signed-off-by: CAI Qian <[email protected]>
> 
> --- ltp-full-20090228/lib/Makefile.orig       2009-04-02 15:33:19.000000000
> +0800
> +++ ltp-full-20090228/lib/Makefile    2009-04-02 15:39:21.000000000 +0800
> @@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
>  PREFIX=/opt/ltp
>  
>  CFLAGS+= -Wall
> -CFLAGS+= -D_USC_LIB_ -D__UCLIBC__
>  CPPFLAGS+= -I../include 
>  ifeq ($(shell uname -s),HP-UX)
>  CFLAGS+=-Ae -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE +DA1.1
>  endif
> -CFLAGS+=$(if $(UCLINUX),-DUCLINUX)
> +ifeq ($(UCLINUX),1)
> +CFLAGS+= -D_USC_LIB_ -D__UCLIBC__ -DUCLINUX
> +endif
>  LDFLAGS+=
>  TARGET=libltp.a
>  SRCS=$(wildcard *.c)
> --- ltp-full-20090228/testcases/kernel/fs/doio/growfiles.c.orig       
> 2009-04-02
> 15:31:39.000000000 +0800
> +++ ltp-full-20090228/testcases/kernel/fs/doio/growfiles.c    2009-04-02
> 15:32:53.000000000 +0800
> @@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@
>                               return -1;
>                       }
>  #if NEWIO
> -#ifdef sgi
> +#if defined(sgi) || defined(__linux__)
>                       /* If this is POSIX I/O and it is via aio_{read,write}
>                        * or lio_listio then after completion of the I/O the
>                        * value of the file offset for the file is
> @@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@
>                                       tmp = Woffset + grow_incr;
>                               }
>                       }
> -#endif
> +#endif /* sgi __linux__ */
>  #endif
>               }
>               *curr_size_ptr=tmp;     /* BUG:14136 */
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--Growfiles%3A-Fix-Test-Failures-tp22844092p22996795.html
Sent from the ltp-list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to