On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:25 PM, in message
> <[email protected]>, Garrett Cooper
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:16 PM, in message
>>> <[email protected]>, Garrett
>>> Cooper
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> This cleans up existing swap files in swapon03 test in failing test case.
>>>> Otherwise, deleted swap files would still exist in /proc/swaps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Murlin Ray Wenzel [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Why not implement this as part of cleanup?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Garrett
>>>
>>> I can look at doing that. I just grabbed the closest place that worked for
>> me. BTW I'm still looking at a possible kernel bug where you can't allocate
>> the maximum number of swap files.
>>
>> What kernel version are you working with?
>> -Garrett
>
> I'm testing on 2.6.32.7, but I've been told that the same problem doesn't
> happen on 2.6.33 and it shouldn't happen on some as yet unknown previous
> versions.
If they changed the maximum number of swap files, then this would
be the cause for the problem as it's set to 30 since 2.6.18. See
include/swaponoff.h .
HTH,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
