On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:15:22AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > > Welcome to ltp community. > > > > We are in process of changing our sf.net host repository to > > GIT from CVS.[ Any input/discussion on this is highly appreciable ]. If > > possible this month end release may get delayed based on responses from > > list or next month end (i.e: March ) release will be based on git tree. > > > > I usually try to read all patches posted to ltp mailing list, and follow > > almost all discussions on list, unless the topic is about an obscure > > corner that i do not personally use. But i am obviously not perfect.If > > you sent a patch that you did not hear from anybody for three days, > > that is a very good indication that it was dropped on the floor --- please > > do not hesitate to remind me. > > > > The list archive is available at: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=ltp-list&r=1&w=2 > > > > > > Please use this public site to point out messages in mailing list if you > > want to remind someone or again start same thread without altering > > subject line. > > > > Now coming to git transformation this month, you can find gitweb > > interface at : > > > > http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=summary > > > > There are four branches in ltp-dev.git repository that track the source tree > > of ltp: "master", "maint", "next", "pu". I may add more maintanance > > branch if we have huge backward of incompatible feature updates in the > > future to keep an older release alive. > > > > The master branch is meant to contain what are very well tested and > > ready to be used in production environment. There could occassionaly be > > minor breakage but they are not expected to be anything major, and more > > importantly those will be quickly and trivially fixable. > > > > So if some hotfixes has gone with this branch, you can find one more > > digit has been added to version release (e.g: YYYYMMDD.1 ), So it means > > it is more stable than YYYYMMDD release. I may be changing this format > > if i can see a better format or if you have some suggestion then it is > > most welcome. > > > > The "maint" branch is called one step before master branch, which will > > contain all features or patches that are going to following month end > > release. > > (e.g: If this month end ltp-full-YYYYMMDD is going be to released > > then all the stable patches you can find in this branch through out the > > month, and one important point for this branch is all the patches which > > has gone to this branch will be well tested and make sure that there is > > no regression or breakage and Acked/Reviewed by Someone from mailing > > list.) > > > > "next" branch will contain all the patches which has been sent on > > ltp-mailing list after getting "Acked-By" and/or "Reviewed-By" anyone > > from list. This branch is quite unstable but user can find their > > immediate patches over here to see the stability.You can find most > > unstable about this branch w.r.t feature wise or may be sometime build > > wise. > > > > > > NOTE: > > ===== > > So i always encourage testcase developer/ltp-list member to send me the > > patches against this branch. And it will be closely reviewed and > > acknowledged by any member from ltp-list community members. Once it gets > > Acked/Reveiwed-By then it will promoted to maint branch for maintainer > > testing and checking for stability, otherwise it will go to "pu" branch > > for further discussion and decision. These pending patch can be worked > > on following month and once it is mature enough to meet the stability > > then it can be directly jump to maint branch, here i may ask the > > submitter to submit the patch once again against maint branch. > > > > "pu" branch is basically "proposed update" branch which will contain all > > the remainder of above branches. By the above definition of how "next" > > works, you can tell that this branch will contain quite experimental and > > obviosuly broken stuff. > > > > I would like to thanks everybody who helped me to release ltp-dev git into > > current shape. Especially i would like to thank following: > > - git.git from where actually i picked up this branch > > identification. > > - Garret, who has worked with me step by step to release this git > > tree implementation to ltp-l...@. > > - All my team member from IBM who basically gave encourageable > > input and specially Aneesh, Subrata, Iranna & kamalesh. > > - And finally to Linux kernel, who motivated me to maintain such a > > testsuits with git. > > > > This Maintainer Note will be available under doc/MaintNotes of > > month end release. > > > > > > Usage: > > > > #git clone git://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/ltp/ltp-dev.git ltp-dev > > (Make sure you have the latest autoconf/automake before running make > > autotools ) > > #make autotools > > #./configure > > #make > > #make install > > #cd /opt/ltp > > #./runltp > > > > Please do not hesitate to reply this mail if you have any query in your > > mind, it may help me to generate a good FAQ :) . > > > > Happy Testing!!! > > Nice. I briefly looked at git via gitweb and will be good to add some > more tags. I prefer to add different tag than you used. For example for > this comming will be good to use tag "LTP-20100228"
First thanks for your time and giving a valuable input. yes i also feel the same giving LTP-20100228 will be a nice idea, but i was thinking to use tagging as version instead of monthly string, as in future we may not be able to release stable tree every month end. Actually there is no need to touch this stable (master branch) release every month. So we are in process of thinking to release version wise or some new keyword which can be also suggested over here. > http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=c288167e111d34d5146dbbe5ebb19c84153ee67b > > And also will be good to call that commit in better way - not "Fixed the > typo in changelog". Agree. > > There are several funny commits too ( for example: > 2279bf46ad12b3e75c512e9f146bc60a49220444, > dfac29ccbb03db3e4ee3fa5674cbbbf0104b08aa and others). > > I hope that there will be the correct description in commit message. For > example this commit message should be better. > http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=c0e37ca6731cada152573522d48d08513029e44a > > Anyway. I like that ltp was moved to git. Thanks. With this move we want many developer also to contribute to LTP project, please let me or garret know if you have some FVT testsuit git tree or standalone , which can be merged with this tree. Again thanks for your time and review. -- Thanks & Regards Rishi LTP Maintainer IBM, LTC, Bangalore Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
