----- "Garrett Cooper" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> On 7/14/2010 at 07:03 AM, in message
> >
> <1263127425.237831279112632038.javamail.r...@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat
> > com>, Caspar Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi all, I find a FAIL result in syscalls/swapon03 with RHEL6
> kernel,
> >> on a x86_64 machine, it always fails with the following message:
> >>
> >> swapon03    1  TFAIL  :  Failed swapon for file swapfile30:
> errno=EPERM(1):
> >> Operation not permitted
> >> swapon03    1  TFAIL  :  Failed to setup swaps
> >>
> >> This is because in some >=2.6.32 kernels, the
> >> CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE option is enabled by default in kernel.
> >> As the NOTES in man 2 swapon says:
> >>
> >> "...Since kernel 2.6.32, the limit is decreased by 1 if the kernel
> is built
> >> with the CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE option..."
> >>
> >
> > That's not the only option that affects MAX_SWAPFILES now.
> >
> >> so MAX_SWAPFILES is not 30 anymore, it's 29. While LTP defines
> MAX_SWAPFILES
> >> to 30 in include/swaponoff.h(hmmm....hardcode, I don't think it's a
> good
> >> idea :-|).
> >>
> >> So the way to solve(maybe) the problem is clear: change
> MAX_SWAPFILES
> >> to 29 when CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE is enabled. My question is: is
> there
> >> a good way to check whether a kernel option is enabled or not? I
> searched
> >> in the old discussions in this maillist and found nothing. I want
> to know if
> >>
> >> the developers have some new ideas?
> >>
> >
> > I've seen 28 as the MAX as well, it all depends on the config
> options.  I've been looking at re-architecting the test to do some
> sort of repeat test to the max number of successful swap creations and
> then verifying that the same number is reachable at least 2 times.
>  MAX_SWAPFILES is never exported to userspace.  It's a compile time
> #define that depends on the kernel config options.
> 
>     What about /proc/config.gz (or something similar)? Seems like a
> simple enough thing to check for absolute clarity... don't remember
> the kernel option for that though.

/proc/config.gz doesn't existed on some platforms(which doesn't enable
corresponding kernel option), as well as /boot/config-`uname -r`. 
It's not a safe way to find kernel option by search the config file. 

Thanks,
Caspar

-- 
Kernel Associate Quality Engineer
Red Hat Inc. (Beijing R&D Branch)

Red Hat China R&D Branch Unit 907, North Tower C, 
  Raycom Infotech Park, No.2 Kexueyuan Nanlu, 
  Haidian District, Beijing 100190

TEL: +86-10-62608150
Web: http://www.redhat.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to