Garret, Did you get a chance to review these tests further ?
Regards-- Subrata On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:41 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Li Zefan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subrata Modak wrote: > >> Thanks. I need to test this on a suitable kernel. But doubtful if i can > >> add in the default run. > >> > > > > Why? Because it costs 90 secs? This is configurable, and some other > > test suites like cpuctl cost more time. > > > > If a test suite is not run by default, I guess people won't know its > > existence, probably. > > I think that more of the concern stems from the fact that it's a > performance test, and a lot of people complain if and when their test > machines slow down to a halt (take hackbench, proc01, for example). > > There are issues with the code, but it's dealing with the fact that > it's not really written in a portable way. Give me a bit of time and > I'll comment on what needs to be changed. > > Thanks, > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
