On 04/17/2012 10:03 AM, Chen Gong wrote: > 于 2012/4/9 14:02, Chen Gong 写道: >> 于 2012/4/9 12:03, Caspar Zhang 写道: >>> On 04/09/2012 11:10 AM, Chen Gong wrote: >>>> 于 2012/4/6 22:33, Caspar Zhang 写道: >>>>> On 03/21/2012 05:18 PM, Chen Gong wrote: >>>>>> 于 2012/3/16 22:35, Andi Kleen 写道: >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any >>>>>>>> objections >>>>>>>> from you by today. >>>>>>> Fine for me. Copying Gong Chen who did most of the mce-test work >>>>>>> recently >>>>>>> too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Andi >>>>>> Oh, yes. Recently I make a big change on mce-test project and old >>>>>> structure will be reorganized. >>>>>> And I ever looked through the mce-test part in LTP. Unfortunately >>>>>> it is >>>>>> very old and can't run on >>>>>> newer kernel. I hope you can keep current disabled status in LTP and >>>>>> wait my new work is merged. >>>>>> We can talk at that time. Is it OK to you? >>>>> Hi Chen Gong, sorry for late reply, we're planning to remove old >>>>> static >>>>> coded mce-test from LTP, and use it as a submodule, which means, >>>>> mce-test won't be static-coded any more, it's always synced up with >>>>> your >>>>> upstream version, we just need to do some manual ``submodule update`` >>>>> operations to checkout your version when doing a LTP release. So I'll >>>>> merge this patch in, remove all current out-of-date codes, and wait >>>>> for >>>>> your notice of mce-test's next version, so that we can include it >>>>> in our >>>>> next LTP stable release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Caspar >>>>> >>>> It's fine to me. So do you want to get a notice from me after the codes >>>> are merged or you >>>> monitor the upstream status by yourself? >>> I'd appreciate it if you can send me a mail when the codes get merged, >>> but I'll check upstream status as well from time to time. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Caspar >>> >> OK, I will. Now patch is in the review status, so I will tell you ASAP >> after merged. > The new patch for mce-test has been merged, but it looks a little bit wrong > during the merge procedure (all shell scripts execution right are missed). > I'm pushing Andi to fix it, so please don't add mce-test at current stage. > I will tell you when it is ready.
Noted. Thanks for the update. Thanks, Caspar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
