On 07/06/2012 06:00 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote: > On 07/08/2012 08:23 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote: >> Note that this test case might cause kernel freeze. Running with -c 5 will >> highly increase the likelihood of that. > > IIRC, -c is broken, is `-i 5` able to freeze the kernel? If yes, it > would be better to add a new entry to $LTPROOT/runtest/timers or update > the original entry w/ `-i 5` option.
Nope. It seems the hard hang caused by concurrent leap second is unresolved in upstream "NOTE: Some reports have been of a hard hang right at or before the leapsecond. I've not been able to reproduce or diagnose this..." [1] [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/4/78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
