On 08/01/2012 06:23 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> I noticed you put call to "get_a_numa_node()" to "oom()" and "testoom()",
> which is called also from oom01. As I understand from your previous
> email, this test should not be NUMA-aware, correct?
I missed a `if (mempolicy)` inside oom() {....} :-(
Nice catch! Thanks!
Caspar
>
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=oom01 stime=1343713154
> cmdline="oom01"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> <<<test_output>>>
> oom01 0 TINFO : set overcommit_memory to 2
> oom01 1 TCONF : require a NUMA system.
> oom01 2 TCONF : Remaining cases not appropriate for configuration
> oom01 0 TINFO : set overcommit_memory to 0
> <<<execution_status>>>
>
> Regards,
> Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
