Hi,
I was getting the max_map_count test failed. It looked to me failing at
filter_map function. The platform I'm working on is an i686 architecture
running on Virtualbox.
I added below additional macro condition and it's passing now. I want to
understand if not including i686/386 was intentional originally for some
reason? Also vdso part I added additionaly.
#elif defined(__i686__) || defined(__i386__)
static int filter_map(char *line)
{
char buf[BUFSIZ];
int ret;
ret = sscanf(line, "%*p-%*p %*4s %*p %*2d:%*2d %*d %s", buf);
if (ret != 1)
return 0;
return ((strcmp(buf, "[vdso]") == 0) | (strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]") ==
0));
}
On another similar architecture (but the actual h/w board), the same code gives
messages like "4096 map entries in total, but expected 4096 entries" and
reported FAIL, implying map_count and max_maps is same ( Contrary to
map_count==max_maps+1 ). How do we analyze this scenario? Does this mean it is
not exceeding by one for sysctl setting? How to verify that.
Thanks and Regards
Diwakar Sharma
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
