On 03/05/2015 02:26 PM, Li Wang wrote: > Hi, > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 13:01 +0800, Li Wang wrote: >>> Since the timestatp is older than now it cause this testcase >>> failed like this: >>> + touch -c -t 201503030303.55 file0.in >>> + ar -ru /tmp/ar01-28953/lib.a file0.in file2.in >>> ... >>> FAIL - ar with -u flag failed >>> >>> >From the AR(1) Manual pager, ar -u: >>> If you would like to insert only those of the files you list >>> that are newer than existing members of the same names, use >>> this modifier. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liw...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> testcases/commands/ade/ar/ar01 | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/testcases/commands/ade/ar/ar01 >>> b/testcases/commands/ade/ar/ar01 >>> index 32fef11..c5181a3 100755 >>> --- a/testcases/commands/ade/ar/ar01 >>> +++ b/testcases/commands/ade/ar/ar01 >>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ do >>> File2time=`ar -tv $TCtmp/lib.a | grep file2.in` >>> >>> #sleep 5 >>> - touch -c -t 201503030303.55 file0.in >>> + touch -c -t 208503030303.55 file0.in >> >> How about >> touch -c -t $(date --date='next day' +"%Y%m%d%H%M") file0.in > Agree! > Absolutely it's better than the stable timestatp.
s/timestatp/timestamp/ in comment ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
