On Thu, 16 May 2002 22:39:12 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Skip, > > Cool stuff, but I think it loses its meaning when done like > this. As far as SNMP is concerned, it's just a bunch of text.
Yep, until you try to parse it on the other end... > I think the right way is to have an LTSP MIB with individual > fields for the datapoints you are interested in. Well, I'm hoping this is what I'm calling the "Redhat MIB", but I don't know for certain. > But, I think the standard Linux MIB already has all of that > data. It's been a while since I looked at it though. Yeah, it just goes on, and on, and on... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brian Fahrländer Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad Evansville, IN My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com ICQ 5119262 AOL: WheelDweller Yahoo: WheelDweller Me: http://www.kamakiriad.com/aboutme.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net