Dear George Hart, Once you wrote about "[Ltsp-discuss] What is the best way to load balance ltsp servers?": GH> I am in a situation where my company will need to have at least four GH> terminal servers to balance the load in the office. While ltsp works GH> really good, I am having trouble figuring how to load balance these GH> servers in a scaleable way. GH> GH> I took a look at clustering the servers (openmosix) but decided against GH> it because it appears that if one node goes down then the whole cluster GH> can fail. This is too unrealiable for me. GH> GH> Currently I am considering hacking etherboot to balance where it gets GH> the kernel from tftp. I am not sure how easy that would be, so I GH> thought I would post a question before I do something unusal. GH> GH> Is anyone aware of a good way to balance the load across terminal servers?
I did not have any experience of this kind, but soon I will have to do the same thing. Please keep me (list?) updated on your progress. :) TIA. -- Best regards, Leonid Mamtchenkov, RHCE System Administrator Francoudi & Stephanou Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
