On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:07:50 -0600, inode0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any thoughts about how I might proceed to nudge the Etherboot client > to get a lease?
While this solution isn't very satisfying to me, I have resolved the problem with the WET11 by forcing the WET11 to use the MAC of the Term 150e. Then etherboot's dhcp client can successfully negotiate a lease with the dhcp server on the other side of the WET11. I think it is safe to say that the WET11 is doing something unsavory to the dhcp packets as they go through it. In any event, at least one LTSP client can work on the other side of the bridge. It would sure be nice to be able to have multiple clients connected to a switch behind the bridge, but it doesn't appear that will be happening with this bridge. I would be very interested in hearing about a bridge that is capable of having multiple LTSP clients attached to it through a switch if anyone know of one. I guess it is now officially Merry Christmas time. Thanks, John ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
