On Saturday 21 July 2007 13:02, Ben Green wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:55:35 +0100, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the contrary, by using dynamically updated DNS server from DHCP, we > > don't need to maintain the ip -> hostname, and hostname -> ip tables > > anymore. The DNS and DHCP will work together to provide hostname and ip > > resolution. It's still interesting though, to know whether the scenario > > is possible for LTSP setup. > > So what would be the point of that?
Imagine maintaining manually the hostname table / DNS record with 100+ clients. -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 1:25pm up 5:14, 2.6.18.2-34-default GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
pgpFNmjBN5hoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
