On 28/10/2007, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The attraction of LTSP5 is support for new hardware via a new server OS > as the years go by. The attraction of 4.2 is that it just works (but > will date; eg we're running LTSP3 on RedHat9 and it's starting to really > hurt)
Correct surmise but wrong diagnosis. The hurt is likely to come from RH9 rather than ltsp3/4 If your server o/d is updated to latest hardware then running 3.x/4.x along side should still be good. > Anybody sell me the solution (non-english pardon the idiom) > Anybody tell me what you think is a good idea on the way to go from here > I think ltsp3.x/4.x is something that needs to co-exist with ltsp5.x since the reuse of older hardware attraction is only possible with 3.x/4.x -- Regards, Sudev Barar ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
