On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Dr. Ruediger Kupper wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 16:13 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > I'm not saying we don't have another bug with dmrc handling, but > > telling people to change LDM_XSESSION on a system that's running an up > > to date ldm is just plain wrong and will cause weird bugs that will > > take us weeks to figure out. A lot of race conditions in DBUS and the > > general desktop tend to happen when you don't call /etc/X11/Xsession. > > Acknowledged. (If so, LDM_XSESSION should perhaps be entirely removed.)
there are valid use cases of LDM_XSESSION (i.e. pointing it to a valid Xsession script on some new distro with Xsession in an unusual location, using a wrapper around a valid Xsession script). just because a feature is being used wrongly suggests to me we need to improve the documentation, not start removing every feature people don't understand. both LDM_SESSION and LDM_XSESSION have been documented in the lts.conf manpage since at least mid-2009, although maybe not well documented. live well, vagrant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
