Re, On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:34:23PM -0400, Abraham Close wrote:
> Wow thanks for the quick reply. Just three more questions: Are you > guys saying I shouldn't do fat clients? I don't think so (so, you should probably do fat clients in your case). If I understand right, your clients are just as powerfull as the intended servers (same machines, right ?). So you should probably not divide the server power between clients which are themselves as powerfull : you will waste clients ressources in this case. By doing fat clients, you still benefit from the centralized setup that LTSP provide (only one installation for whatever clients you have). > And what network switch do you recommend for 20 clients? A Gigabit one (with at least 20 ports). I like Netgear switches, but the brand should not matter. > Also is this a good ssd: > http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-64-2-5-Inch-Solid-State-CT064M4SSD2/dp/B004W2JKWG > for the server? I don't know. Basicaly, you should try to get enterprise class SSD (SLC vs. MLC). Intel's ones have good reputation in the past, but I don't know if it's still true. Hih, -- JFS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
