On 06/09/2011 12:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Good catch! I missed those parts from the urcu.c wait/wakeup scheme (decrement initially, and also set to 0 explicitely when breaking the loop without waiting). I just added them with commit c768e45ed336970a42e58e679804f0f455422cd8
Yes, looks good. Paolo _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
