On 08/30/2011 04:56 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
When readers> cores, the n_updates is very unstable, so the result of
n_updates makes less sense.
The result show Paolo's patch has advance,
but my patch has more advance for reader site performance.
No doubt about that---we're just looking for the right abstraction for
your patch.
Do you have a pointer to a paper or something explaining the "proxy
lock" concept?
Paolo
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
