On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 17:25 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:27:08PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > This is the same issue I found recently with kprobes [1]. There is also > > an inconsistency as function symbols in loadable module do have bit zero > > set, but if the module is built-in then bit zero is clear. > > Does that mean that some different infrastructure is used to get the module > symbols compared with kallsyms?
Yes, there's different infrastructure to handle symbols in loadable modules compared to those in the kernel binary. I mentioned this in [1], or in your Linaro inbox on 29th Aug ;-) > That feels nasty -- they should at least > be consistent... I agree, getting them consistent would solve half the problem. -- Tixy [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg138283.html _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
