On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 10:53 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > That's a stretch in calling version numbers. All but the madvise case > above are how many parameters it takes, not really a "version" number. > > It's adding a new syscall, not updating a version and then deprecating > the old one. As I believe all the above are still supported. >
Actually, the madvise1() isn't supported. But this just shows that it has nothing to do with a version number. What version is madvise()? -- Steve _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
