Am 22.11.2013 01:17, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Alexander Holler <[email protected]> wrote:
Basically, your whole argument boils down to "if the function did
something else than what it does, then it wouldn't be const, so we
shouldn't mark it const". But that argument is BULLSHIT, because the
fact is, the function *doesn't* do what you try to claim it does.
Maybe gcc just makes the same false conclusion as I did in my description.
I read it as current_thread_info() returns "a pointer to something
local" instead of returns "a pointer". Might be BULLSHIT but would
explain the bug which seems to exist.
Alexander Holler
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
