"Mark E. Dawson, Jr." <medawso...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Ah, so even the wfcqueue is a linked list under the covers? No > ring buffer or other cache-friendly data structure types > available?
Yes it's a linked list, but wfcqueue does no allocations under the covers; but rather the structure is embedded into whatever struct you give it (similar to the well-known Linux kernel linked list, using the container_of macro). In other words, you may use a cache-friendly allocator for all the structs you might place into it. But you already get some cache friendliness by avoiding the extra pointer to the struct you're actually storing. _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
