----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
> To: "Philippe Proulx" <ppro...@efficios.com>
> Cc: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lt...@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam"
> <matthew.khou...@ericsson.com>, "Jeremie
> Galarneau" <jga...@efficios.com>, "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
> "diamon-discuss"
> <diamon-disc...@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2020 08:08:04
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are
> implementation-defined
> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:51 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
>> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Proulx ppro...@efficios.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
>>>> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lt...@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam"
>>>> <matthew.khou...@ericsson.com>,
>>>> diamon-disc...@linuxfoundation.org, ppro...@efficios.com, "Jeremie
>>>> Galarneau"
>>>> <jga...@efficios.com>
>>>> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
>>>> <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:24
>>>> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are
>>>> implementation-defined
>>>
>>>> From: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lt...@versatic.net>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lt...@versatic.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> common-trace-format-specification.md | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>>>> b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>>>> index fd49e59..f5fea51 100644
>>>> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>>>> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>>>> @@ -464,6 +464,9 @@ enum {
>>>> }
>>>> ~~~
>>>>
>>>> +The mappings in the enumeration type do not have to be exhaustive.
>>>> +Unlisted values are implementation defined.
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Why not just:
>>>
>>> An enumeration field can have an integral value which its type does not
>>> map to a string.
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> Good point, I will use that wording.
>
> Geneviève pointed out on IRC that the sentence above is weird. Would the
> following convey the right meaning ?
>
> "An enumeration field can have an integral value for which the associated
> enumeration
> type does not map to a string."
Sure.
Phil
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>> ### 4.2 Compound types
>>>>
>>>> Compound are aggregation of type declarations. Compound types include
>>>> --
>>> > 2.11.0
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
>> http://www.efficios.com
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
