On 20 May 2011 12:22, steve donovan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > (Those using more sensible operating systems can safely skip this. You > can also skip this if the MS toolchain satisfies your needs.) > [...] Now why I am thinking aloud: essentially the default will become pure > mingw when one specifies an external version of Lua, which is a change > of behaviour. > > Does this feel reasonable? > > Yes. I had quite some trouble getting LR to work with mingw and Luajit. For the most part, I hacked around it, copying lua51.dll to lua5.1.lib and a couple of other things I've forgotten about. If it could work more out-of-box for mingw, that'd be nice - as long as it doesn't cause problems for those using the MS toolset. Oisín steve d. > > [1] Yes, I know, use MSYS to get a more consistent environment. But > that would be imposing a particular toolset on end users. A more > typical scenario is something using a single install of mingw (e.g. > TDM) and then having the choice of whether they want the pseudo-Unix > environment. > > _______________________________________________ > Luarocks-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers >
_______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
