On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd rather not parse error messages. There's the issue of > internationalization, and error messages are not a well-defined > protocol (they can and do change unexpectedly).
Yes, it is the kind of cowboy practice that will lead to puzzled and irritated users; a better way would be a little C extension that calls LoadLibrary or dlopen, depending on the user's current religion. > Yes, but that's a related but different problem. Providing a list of > alternative paths/names for includes and libraries is on the wishlist. That would be a good thing; it would allow the package maintainer to specify things in a more flexible way. steve d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
