On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Holger Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi,
Hi, and sorry about the late reply! > I have installed Luarocks 2.0.6 on Linux using the following > configuration: > > ./configure \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --sysconfdir=/etc/luarocks \ > --lua-suffix=5.1 \ > --with-lua-include=/usr/include \ > --with-lua-lib=/usr/lib \ > --rocks-tree=/usr/local/lib/luarocks \ > --with-downloader=wget \ > --with-md5-checker=md5sum > > When I run, for example, "luarocks install lunamark", luarocks correctly > installs lunamark and its dependencies. However, does *not* install the > command-line scripts that come with this rock. What am I doing wrong? You did nothing wrong. The problem was that the rockspec format was underspecified in a particular point, and rockspec authors assumed something different from what I implemented. The rockspec of lunamark uses a construct which I didn't cater for (and I missed it when uploading the rockspec), and LDoc uses the same non-feature. Now I just implemented the feature, so that things work as developers seem to expect (modified behavior of string keys in build.install in rockspecs). The change was just pushed, so the current code git installs the lunamark command-line scripts properly. The next release will no longer have this problem. -- Hisham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
