> -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Guisasola Gorham [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: vrijdag 25 mei 2012 15:38 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] [ANN] LuaRocks 2.0.9-rc1 > > Hi Thijs > > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Thijs Schreijer wrote: > > >> From: Tomas Guisasola Gorham [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: vrijdag 25 mei 2012 1:45 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] [ANN] LuaRocks 2.0.9-rc1 > >> > >> Hi Hisham > >> > >> On Thu, 24 May 2012, Hisham wrote: > >>> I'm calling this a minor version because the release adds new > >> features > >>> to the command-line tools but shouldn't add any changes to the > >>> rockspec format. > >> I think we use the third digit to bug fixes; adding new features > >> should change the second digit. It would be reasonable to change > the > >> first digit when the rockspec format changes... Just my opinion. > > > > See http://semver.org/ > You haven't said, but I think you agree with me, don't you? > In particular, the points 7 and 8 define a "patch version" as a > bug fix which increments the third digit, and a "minor version" as the > introduction of backwards campatible new features, which increments the > second digit... > > Regards, > Tomás
To me it's not about agreeing, I just like the attempt to standardize the versioning. I think it was already adopted by NuGet.org and some other high profile organizations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
