On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > Users already complained about this behavior: > https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/pull/89
Note that this patch is for another use-case. Not system and local (i.e. user's) tree, but two-level system tree hierarchy. That is, specifically, trees in /usr/ and /usr/local/. A rocks in /usr/ can not have dependencies in /usr/local. If we need to add protection that ensures that case to the patch, we'll do that (seems a good idea). If you have hints on implementation, please share. Alexander. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
