On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@vaughan.pe> wrote:
> It would be really cool if Luarocks had some facility for virtual 
> dependencies,
> so that, for example, both lyaml and luaYAML could satisfy a yaml dependency,

It's indeed a useful concept, and time to think about how the next
rockspec version can support it.

My understanding is that if you already have lyaml OR luaYAML then LR
is satisfied. If neither, then pick the first one?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers

Reply via email to