On 29 March 2013 05:23, Wouter Scherphof <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of maybe reopening an old discussion, I wonder: > > How would you feel about installing rocks locally within each project, so > that different projects' dependencies can't interfere, and each project > self-contains all of its dependencies?
That is supported, by use of the --tree and the --deps-mode=one flags. (See http://www.luarocks.org/en/luarocks for a description of --deps-mode) > I mean: each project should contain its own rocks_tree, and it should be the > default tree for installs. When loading rocks, the tree should be sought in > the current directory, and if not found, one directory up towards the root, > and so on. The installation package for Sputnik ( http://spu.tnik.org ) does exactly that; sputnik plugins are private rocks. -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
