Thx. It is a lot smaller, so one problem less :)
From: steve donovan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: vrijdag 5 april 2013 19:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] MinGW and LuaSocket
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Thijs Schreijer
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So lua and luac both contain their own Lua core (they don't need the dll iirc).
Then even when I link a library against "lua51.dll" I get two Lua-cores loaded
at runtime; 1 in lua.exe, 2 in lua51.dll which the library was linked against.
luac.exe is supposed to be statically linked, but lua.exe is linked against
lua51.dll. This should be obvious from their sizes, lua.exe should be quite
small after stripping. So there really should only be one Lua core involved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
